Evaluation of ankle ligaments with CT: A feasibility study.

PURPOSE: This study aims to systematically investigate if normal ankle ligaments can be assessed with CT imaging, using MRI as reference standard. METHODS: 35 patients (mean age: 47 ±â€¯15 years; female n = 19) with combined CT and MRI exams and without MR-morphologic signs of ankle ligamental injury were retrospectively identified. 3 readers independently evaluated the syndesmotic, the lateral and medial ankle ligaments in terms of visibility on a 4-point Likert scale (0-3 points) in multiplanar MDCT images in standard bone kernel reconstructions. In consensus CT-based ligament density and thickness were measured and the appearance was rated for each ligament. Results were compared and validated with corresponding MRI images. RESULTS: Almost all ankle ligaments identified in MRI images could be adequately depicted in standard multiplanar bone kernel CT images with a mean visual score of 2.7/3 (± 0.2). Difficulties in CT morphological delineation of ankle ligaments occurred in cases of filiform TNL and TCL and in cases of concurrent soft tissue edema. Interreader agreement for the CT-assessment of ankle ligaments was excellent, with Fleiss Kappa values >0.8. Mean density of evaluated medial and lateral ankle ligaments was 68 ±â€¯2.9 HU, with substantially inter- and intraindividual variations. Thickness measurements and assessment of appearance of ankle ligaments showed a good concordance between CT and MRI. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of normal ankle ligaments via standard CT in bone kernel reconstructions is feasible, with some restrictions concerning the medial collateral ligaments and in the presence of soft tissue edema.

Dual energy CT allows for improved characterization of response to antiangiogenic treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the potential role of dual energy CT (DECT) to visualize antiangiogenic treatment effects in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) while treated with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKI). METHODS: 26 patients with mRCC underwent baseline and follow-up single-phase abdominal contrast enhanced DECT scans. Scans were performed immediately before and 10 weeks after start of treatment with TKI. Virtual non-enhanced (VNE) and colour coded iodine images were generated. 44 metastases were measured at the two time points. Hounsfield unit (HU) values for VNE and iodine density (ID) as well as iodine content (IC) in mg/ml of tissue were derived. These values were compared to the venous phase DECT density (CTD) of the lesions. Values before and after treatment were compared using a paired Student's t test. RESULTS: Between baseline and follow up, mean CTD and DECT-derived ID both showed a significant reduction (p < 0.005). The relative reduction measured in percent was significantly greater for ID than for CTD (49.8 ± 36,3 % vs. 29.5 ± 20.8 %, p < 0.005). IC was also significantly reduced under antiangiogenic treatment (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Dual energy CT-based quantification of iodine content of mRCC metastases allows for significantly more sensitive and reproducible detection of antiangiogenic treatment effects. KEY POINTS: • A sign of tumour response to antiangiogenic treatment is reduced tumour perfusion. • DECT allows visualizing iodine uptake, which serves as a marker for vascularization. • More sensitive detection of antiangiogenic treatment effects in mRCC is possible.

[Cross-sectional imaging evaluation of renal masses]. / Schnittbildgebung der Nierentumoren.

Cross-sectional imaging modalities including multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the diagnostic standard in detection, characterization, and staging of renal masses due to their high sensitivity and specificity. Currently, most renal masses are incidentally diagnosed by imaging for other medical reasons. Recent developments have improved image acquisition with high resolution, while simultaneously reducing radiation dose. CT imaging is the most accessible cross-sectional imaging method and is, therefore, the standard technique. MRI is indicated in patients who are allergic to intravenous CT contrast medium, in patients with renal insufficiency, or in younger patients. Further characterization of renal masses is possible with functional imaging including dual energy CT, perfusion CT, or diffusion-weighted MRI. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound allows detection of even subtle enhancement in hypovascular lesions with high sensitivity and can add valuable information to CT and MRI studies.

[Modern imaging of kidney tumors]. / Moderne Bildgebung von Nierentumoren.

If a renal mass is suspected on clinical examination or ultrasound the finding has to be confirmed by cross-sectional imaging. Methods that are used include multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Also contrast-enhanced ultrasound has been successfully implemented in renal imaging and now plays a major role in the differentiation of benign from malignant renal masses. In expert hands it can be used to show very faint vascularization and subtle enhancement. The MDCT technique benefits from the recently introduced dual energy technology that allows superior characterization of renal masses in a single-phase examination, thereby greatly reducing radiation exposure. For young patients and persons allergic to iodine MRI should be used and it provides excellent soft tissue contrast and visualizes contrast enhancement kinetics in multiphase examinations.This article aims at giving a comprehensive overview of these different imaging modalities, their clinical indications and contraindications, as well as a description of imaging findings of various renal masses.

Dendritic cell-based vaccination combined with gemcitabine increases survival in a murine pancreatic carcinoma model.

BACKGROUND: Tumour-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) can be activated in vivo by vaccination with dendritic cells (DCs). However, clinical responses to DC-based vaccination have only been observed in a minority of patients with solid cancer. Combination with other treatment modalities such as chemotherapy may overcome immunoresistance of cancer cells. It has been shown previously that gemcitabine sensitises human pancreatic carcinoma cells against CTL-mediated lysis. Here, a murine pancreatic carcinoma model was used to investigate whether combination with gemcitabine increases therapeutic efficacy of DC-based vaccination. METHODS: Bone marrow-derived DCs from C57BL/6 mice were loaded with UV-irradiated, syngeneic Panc02 carcinoma cells and were administered subcutaneously. For prophylactic vaccination, mice were vaccinated three times at weekly intervals prior to tumour challenge with Panc02 cells. Therapeutic vaccination was started when tumours formed a palpable nodule. Gemcitabine was administered intraperitoneally twice weekly. RESULTS: Prophylactic DC-based vaccination completely prevented subcutaneous and orthotopic tumour development and induced immunological memory as well as tumour antigen-specific CTLs. In the subcutaneous tumour model, therapeutic DC-based vaccination was equally effective as gemcitabine (14% vs 17% survival at day 58 after tumour challenge; controls, 0%). Combination of the two strategies significantly increased survival of tumour-bearing mice (50% at day 58 after tumour challenge). DC-based vaccination also prevented death from pulmonary metastatisation after intravenous injection of Panc02 cells. CONCLUSION: DC-based immunotherapy may not only be successfully combined with gemcitabine for the treatment of advanced pancreatic carcinoma, but may also be effective in preventing local recurrence or metastatisation in tumour-free patients.